In seismic interpretation of both 2D and 3D data, the process usually involves both automated and manual picking to achieve a greater understanding of subsurface structures. Following the initial application of automatic horizon picking usually on the easier surfaces, such as the water bottom or mid-Oligocene picks where the software package is quite good at maintaining accuracy, the manual interpretation phase takes center stage. During this phase, interpreters review and refine the auto-picked horizons, ensuring that they precisely capture the intricate geological features present in the seismic data. This manual adjustment is pivotal for achieving a high level of accuracy in the interpretation, as it allows experts to fine-tune the automated results based on their geological expertise.

This comprehensive approach ensures that the interpretation goes beyond the confines of typical patterns and encompasses the full spectrum of subsurface complexities. By integrating their geological knowledge with a detailed analysis of the seismic data, interpreters can uncover subtle geological details, fault lines, tuning effects, and other features critical to a comprehensive understanding of the subsurface.

The significance of manual interpretation lies in its ability to enhance precision, flexibility, and overall insight. Precision is achieved through the adjustments made by interpreters, aligning the interpreted horizons with geological realities, making sure the picks make sense. The flexibility of manual interpretation allows interpreters to adapt to complex geological conditions, recognizing patterns that may not conform to automated algorithms. Ultimately, the integration of both automated and manual interpretation contributes to a detailed understanding of subsurface structures, where the strengths of algorithms and human expertise combine to provide a refined and accurate interpretation of seismic data.

‍